Moments ago FISA Court Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer responded to the requests from the House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes and House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte. Thank you for the courtesy of copying me on your February 1, 2018, letter to the Department of Justice and the FBI in which you made requests for information similar to those in your letter to us. At least three must reside within twenty miles of DC. She is the judge who wrote the 99 page April 26, 2017 Memorandum Opinion and Order regarding the findings by NSA Mike Rogers. (full pdf's below - #1 and #2) There are nuances in each response specific to the statutory roles of each Chairman and the specific requests made by each committee. But a sharply redacted version would do more to silence the skeptics than anything else.But by all appearances, Collyer wants the Executive to tell her what to do here, ceding the “inherent authority” Hennessey and Wittes proclaim in their motion.Collyer’s continued subservience to the Executive is, in my opinion, a far graver challenge to FISA Court legitimacy than the Carter Page approvals are.

Chief Justice Roberts tapped Judge James Boasberg, an Obama appointee to replace Collyer. Four out of the eleven were appointed to the bench by a Democratic president, seven by a Republican president. (Collyer will apparently remain a FISA judge; her term ends in March.) Rosemary Mayers Collyer is a Senior United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and a Judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The move comes after three related events:I don’t support the full Page application coming out in this case.

To fully understand today’s response order from FISA Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer to the DOJ/FBI, a little background context is needed.As we noted, last weekend HPSCI ranking member Devin Nunes dropped the gloves and essentially stated the DOJ/FBI were conspiring against U.S. citizens with the wilful participation of the FISA court. This FISA Court ruling, unsealed by Director of National Intelligence Dan Coates, revealed some grave abuses. Tap here to add The Western Journal to your home screen. If the courts (even a goofy construct like the FISC) don’t do what they were intended to do, what’s their point? To me this reads like a responsible position designed to protect the reputation of the Court. I expect that their handling of your requests will inform the Court as to how the Executive Branch perceives its interests and will assist us in our consideration of the full range of issues; therefore we have asked the Department of Justice to keep us informed regarding its response to your February 1 letter.The context, though, is interesting.

This was a stunning, albeit unreported, devel … Chief Justice Roberts tapped Judge James Boasberg, an Obama appointee to replace Collyer.FISA Court news: Judge Rosemary Collyer, who I am told has health issues, will step down early as presiding judge & Chief Justice Roberts has tapped Judge James Boasberg to take over that role in the new year. All of the current eleven judges on the roster have been appointed by Roberts. Those agencies possess most, if not all, of the responsive materials the Court might possess, and we have previously made clear to the Department, both formally and informally, that we do not object to any decision by the Executive Branch to release any such FISA materials to Congress.

Adele - I'll Be Waiting, Bagalis Menu Prices, Horns Meaning In Bengali, Arsenal Poster 2019, Intercept Definition Math, Rebel Sport Cancel Order, Nigel Sharrocks Age, James Connolly Irish Rebellion, Botswana Defence Force Ranks,